It is also no surprise that as the mobile platform is increasing eating into the media consumption mix, both marketers and media platforms are grappling with its baffling economics, even as they well be on the way to cooking their own golden goose.
Showing posts with label Branding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Branding. Show all posts
Saturday, December 29, 2012
Plus ça change
As the irresistible machine of competitive pressures trundles on, it is no surprise that retailers are scrambling to shore up the weaknesses that they perceive in their rearguard action against the rise of the e-tailer, no matter how suspect the financial metrics of the new measures, be they same-day delivery, the ever-advancing Christmas sale season or technology-augmented shopping.
It is also no surprise that as the mobile platform is increasing eating into the media consumption mix, both marketers and media platforms are grappling with its baffling economics, even as they well be on the way to cooking their own golden goose.
It is also no surprise that as the mobile platform is increasing eating into the media consumption mix, both marketers and media platforms are grappling with its baffling economics, even as they well be on the way to cooking their own golden goose.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Engaging business
Customer engagement has been the Holy Grail of marketers ever since they figured out that Web 2.0 and mobile technologies let them reach their targets one-on-one and where they are.
However, as Steve Olenski capably points out, consumers have other ideas. There was a time when engagement meant listening to what the consumer had to say. Perhaps the time has come to resurrect this increasingly quaint notion.
However, as Steve Olenski capably points out, consumers have other ideas. There was a time when engagement meant listening to what the consumer had to say. Perhaps the time has come to resurrect this increasingly quaint notion.
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Social media is for brands
To some surprise and consternation, social media is not showing up as a significant driver of sale conversions.
Twitter, in fact, has apparently clocked in a particularly dismal 0.00% conversion rate. Nonetheless, in survey after survey, consumers indicate social media as influencing their purchasing decisions. In order to understand the discrepancy we need to recall another medium that is commonly used for advertising that is highly effective in influencing decisions but not at all in driving sales: outdoor. In fact, the more mature social media marketing is growing the more it resembles outdoor advertising in its impact.
Twitter, in fact, has apparently clocked in a particularly dismal 0.00% conversion rate. Nonetheless, in survey after survey, consumers indicate social media as influencing their purchasing decisions. In order to understand the discrepancy we need to recall another medium that is commonly used for advertising that is highly effective in influencing decisions but not at all in driving sales: outdoor. In fact, the more mature social media marketing is growing the more it resembles outdoor advertising in its impact.
Monday, November 26, 2012
Twitter is not a charity
It is true that I have pointed out some shortcomings in Twitter's monetization strategy, but that is a very long way from damning the entire enterprise as somehow abandoning its roots to become an extractive system.
Yes, Twitter has strong incentives to show returns on the billion dollars of investment that it has already absorbed, but that was its purpose in the first place. No more than any other for-profit startup, Twitter was always intended to generate returns. Now most business plans begin with a business model, while Twitte's turning that equation on its head has left it to scramble late in the day to find sufficient revenue streams to show IPO-worthy value. For most enterprises this would be a terminal condition, but as Twitter is demonstrably effective at communicating brand messaging, perhaps it will yet prove an exception.
Yes, Twitter has strong incentives to show returns on the billion dollars of investment that it has already absorbed, but that was its purpose in the first place. No more than any other for-profit startup, Twitter was always intended to generate returns. Now most business plans begin with a business model, while Twitte's turning that equation on its head has left it to scramble late in the day to find sufficient revenue streams to show IPO-worthy value. For most enterprises this would be a terminal condition, but as Twitter is demonstrably effective at communicating brand messaging, perhaps it will yet prove an exception.
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Twitter responds (sort of and in deed)
As Dalton Caldwell has also noticed, Twitter is repositioning itself as a few-to-many information delivery platform: perfect for getting out brand messaging and less focused on many-to-many microblogging.
As I have already argued, this is an inevitable and -- for Twitter's finances -- necessary move. Now, if its management team would recall that undermining partner ecosystems is not a certain way to riches but rather focus on charging tolls on the value it does deliver.
As I have already argued, this is an inevitable and -- for Twitter's finances -- necessary move. Now, if its management team would recall that undermining partner ecosystems is not a certain way to riches but rather focus on charging tolls on the value it does deliver.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
